"we are blessed with an array of top-class papers…"
This is an agonisingly difficult choice to make. The reason for the
pain is simple; we are blessed with an array of top-class papers and
every photographer will have their favourite, although very few will
have the time, opportunity, or inclination to test more than a
handful. At Professional Imagemaker we have now tested something
like 1,000 printer/paper combinations – that’s our job! When trying
to decide upon a paper you have to work your way through a number of
options and find your way down through a family tree of the
characteristics. Here is our attempt at describing the questions you
need to answer.
First you have to decide on your printer, (should you have more than
one?) which will also govern the maximum print size.
Then decide between matt or not matt surfaces – hence
MK or PK inkset.
Decide if you are prepared to tolerate OBAs in your media.
Decide upon textured, smooth, lustre, or canvas as your surface
finish.
Decide if you want 100% cotton rag or an alpha cellulose base.
Decide upon the paper caliper
Decide upon the paper weight. Fine Art Trade Guild demand 250gsm
minimum for example. Some printers have a limit on paper thickness.
Decide upon sheet or roll stock (or even board).
Decide upon ABW printing (Epson only) or 'colour' or CIS
Blacks – based on Dmax, metamerism, etc.
The one thing you should not do is be seduced by the print before you, and allow
the ‘content’ of the image to determine your choice. Just because you are
looking at a magnificent Paul Gallagher print does not mean that his paper/
printer/workflow choice is right for you. Your work might be fundamentally
different and fundamentally unsuited to his approach. On the other hand the
quality of his prints may show you just how much depth you can invoke in an
inkjet print!
The other thing you should avoid is making side-byside comparisons of matt and
gloss/lustre prints. The two types are so fundamentally different that matt will
always look a little ‘flat’ alongside its flashy, high-Dmax cousin. However, if
you allow the matt image to stand alone (and never show a client both) it can
import wonderful subtlety to the viewer. It is highly unlikely that an image
file prepared for a gloss paper will print perfectly to a matt paper especially
in the deeper tones. The slightest tendency to over-saturate the matt paper with
too much ink can bring unexpected and unpleasant surprises; a light touch may be
needed. If you imagine that such finesse can be achieved with profiling and
instruments you may be in for a shock. It is far more likely that you will have
to make proof copies and experiment. One advantage of inkjet over silver halide
is that you can anticipate much greater print-to-print consistency. Providing
you archive the correct file and keep notes about the settings, it is most
likely that you will be able to produce identical prints for some time after the
first-offs.
Your biggest danger is that your printer will be superseded and the inkjet
changed. Although it will most likely be an improvement it will not necessarily
be the same!
So far we have avoided answering the question about which is the best paper! Any
of the baryta-type papers will create an excellent mimic of an air-dried silver
halide fibre-based paper. Our favourites amongst these are Epson Traditional
Photo Paper, Permajet Royal, Fotospeed Platinum, Innova Ultra Smooth and almost
any of the Hahnemühle baryta papers. Epson TPP and Permajet Royal are
particularly flat and well behaved in the printer, Innova Ultra Smooth holds the
record for colour fidelity. Some of the Hahnemühle products also carry the
well-respected Photo Rag tag. Their Fine Art Pearl 285 is one paper that stands
out in our minds. Ilford Galerie has a strong following and performed well in
our tests as well as being the most competitive on price.
Outside of the baryta papers our favourite is Epson Premium Luster for it
achieves high brightness without the use of OBAs, is quite resistant to marking
and has a delightful silk sheen.
The matt papers present even greater problems and even wider choices. Hahnemühle
Photo Rag is a recognised standard, against which others are judged and is
available as a re-boxed variant from a number of suppliers. It has few vices in
use, although there are some brighteners in the mix and we have noted some
yellowing with age. It is also available in Ultra Smooth and bright white
guises. The Ultra Smooth we are fond of, along with the weighty 350gsm Museum
Etching. Museum has a little texture but held detail well and is impressive to
hold as an un-mounted print. Their Bamboo also performed very well for the
ecologically conscious. The Museo papers have a following in the USA although we
found them slightly more challenging to use.
If you are looking for something to mark you out from the crowd Hahnemühle make
Photo Rag in a 460gsm weight. St Cuthbert's Mill also used to produce a similar
weight in Somerset Velvet (it is textured and we are not sure it is still
around). Both, though, are mighty papers, which are impressive when you hold an
un-mounted print. Innova also produces the Smooth Cotton High White in a 450gsm
(IFA18).
For a plain and simple approach Epson's Archival Matt and Enhanced Matt are well
regarded in the specialist monochrome forums. They have a very smooth surface
which holds detail well in a mono image.
Looking back over the last few paragraphs we are conscious that we have
mentioned quite a number of papers. Despite this they represent but a small
fraction of what is available and many of those we have not mentioned have
considerable merits. This is the problem you are confronted with, the choice is
wide and good; we are blessed with abundance! On the following pages we discuss
the pros and cons of matt versus glossy or lustre papers.